The Board can Rely on a Party’s Arguments in an IPR, as Long as it Explains Why
In Outdry Technologies Corp. v. Geox S.P.A., [2016-1769] (June 16, 2017), the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board’s determination that claims 1–15 of U.S. Patent No. 6,855,171 would have been obvious over a combination of prior art. The ‘171 patents claims methods of waterproofing leather, … Continue reading The Board can Rely on a Party’s Arguments in an IPR, as Long as it Explains Why
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed